Example risk / response documentation structure from the GAASFlow methodology library. Risks and responses are fictional for evaluation — tailor every engagement with professional judgment.

Engagement-level decisions (excerpt)

TopicResponseW/P
Additional significant risks beyond presumed fraud risks?No (documented)A-7
Fraud discussion completed?YesA-8
Going-concern indicators?NoGC-1
Related-party activity relevant?Yes — RP programsRP-1

Risk / response matrix (excerpt)

Area / assertionRiskRMMPlanned responseW/P
Management override — All assertions affected Presumed significant fraud risk of management overriding controls Significant Journal-entry testing; accounting-estimate bias review; unusual-transaction evaluation F-1 / A-7
Revenue — Occurrence Revenue recognized before criteria met Mod Cutoff testing; detail tests of sales; analytics AR-1
Receivables — Valuation Allowance understated Mod Aging analysis; subsequent collections; estimates inventory AR-1 / A-26
Inventory — Existence / Valuation Obsolescence; count errors Mod Observation / count procedures; NRV testing INV-1
Cash — Existence Misstatement of cash / reconciling items Low–Mod Bank confirm; recon testing CA-1
Management override Journal entry fraud risk (AU-C 240) Sig (presumed) JE testing; estimates bias; unpredictable procedures F-2

Linkage

Significant estimates (allowance, inventory NRV) are inventoried on A-26 and linked to this matrix. Sampling design (when used) is documented on A-25 / A-17 with evaluation against performance materiality $138,750.

Electronically signed — Preparer
Sam Rivera
Mar 7, 2026 4:40 PM
Electronically signed — Reviewer
Jordan Lee
Mar 8, 2026 1:15 PM