Harbor & Blake LLP · Confidential
A-4 Materiality determination
Planning worksheet · Summit Ridge sampleIllustrative planning worksheet layout as used in GAASFlow. Benchmarks and percentages are engagement-specific judgment examples for the fictional Summit Ridge sample — not firm policy.
Benchmark & calculation
| Input | Amount / rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Primary benchmark | Net sales (revenue) | Stable operating metric for this manufacturer |
| Benchmark amount | $18,500,000 | From trial balance / financials |
| Overall materiality % | 1.0% | Within common practice range; qualitative factors considered |
| Performance materiality % | 75% | Of overall materiality |
| Clearly trivial % | 5% | Of overall materiality |
Overall materiality
$185,000
Performance materiality
$138,750
Clearly trivial
$9,250
Qualitative considerations
- Single manufacturing location; multi-state customer base
- No public markets; privately held C-corporation
- Fraud risks (revenue recognition, management override) considered engagement-wide
- Amounts carried to engagement master and sampling / exception evaluation
Conclusion
Overall materiality is set at $185,000 (approximately 1% of revenue). Performance materiality is $138,750. The clearly trivial threshold is $9,250. These amounts are documented on the engagement master and used for scoping and evaluation under AU-C 320 orientation.
Electronically signed — Preparer
Sam Rivera
Mar 5, 2026 11:20 AM
Electronically signed — Reviewer
Jordan Lee
Mar 6, 2026 9:05 AM